|

Bucklin Of Counsel is the umbrella for various organizations and activities of
Leonard Bucklin as an author, lawyer, ethicist, and consultant to law firm and
business management.
|
This
section you are viewing includes these additional pages |


|

© Copyright Leonard H. Bucklin
2000 to 02/28/2010 ©
All rights reserved. No
copying or distribution of this material may be made without the express written
consent of the copyright holder. For more information -
Read the
Legal Notices.
Part of Disclaimer:
Information contained in pages and articles on this site provides
general information and does not provide legal advice on any specific legal
matter or factual situation. This information is not intended to create or
provide a lawyer-client relationship. It is not legal advice. Readers should not
act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Use of this site
does not create an attorney - client relationship, even if you provide
information to us by any means including using a contact form on this site.
Read full
Disclaimers and Legal Notices.
| |
|
Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a
party must disclose to other parties the identity and opinions of each
testifying expert. The expert must provide a written report to the
opposing party. The Federal Rule states that
" the report shall contain:
- a complete statement of all opinions to be expressed and
the basis and reasons for the opinion;
- the data or other information considered by the witness in forming the
opinions;
- any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the opinions,
- the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications
authored by the witness within the preceding ten years;
- the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony;
- a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as an
expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years."
Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Emphasis
supplied].
Since Rule 26(a)(2)(B) requires that the expert witness's report include a
"complete statement" of "all opinions to be expressed," plus a "complete
statement" of the "basis and reasons" for each opinion. The expert's
report must be reasonably comprehensive. The reach of this Federal Rule
language is uncertain; it is left to the court to decide how much detail is
required to be a "complete statement".
See material on Federal Rule 702 of the
Evidence Rules.
|
|