Bucklin.org is the umbrella for the several  activities of Leonard Bucklin as an author, ethicist, and consultant to corporate and law firm management.

In this section:
Up


© Copyright, 2000 to  2010,  by Leonard  Bucklin. All rights reserved.  No copying or distribution of this material may be made without the express written consent of the copyright holder.  For more information -  Read the Legal Notices.

Information contained in pages and articles on this site provides general information and does not provide legal advice on any specific legal matter or factual situation. This information is not intended to create or provide legal advice or a lawyer-client relationship. It is not legal advice.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Use of this site does not create an attorney - client relationship, even if you provide information to us by any means including using a contact form on this site. 

You may be pressured into producing the company's attorney-client  privileged documents in response to a prosecutor's demand.

Does production automatically waive the privilege in civil suits by other persons?   Here is a tip for what you should insist upon with the prosecutor.

The trial court in In re Natural Gas Commodity Litig., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11950 (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2005) held that a production of privileged documents in response to a prosecutor's demand does not automatically waive the privilege as to other persons. In providing that the documents were still protected, even though disclosed to a government prosecutor in an attempt to avoid criminal prosecution, the court found it important that in the production to the government there was a clear written agreement containing the following points:

  • An express statement that the privileged information was provided to the agency only in reliance on the agency's agreement to return the documents and retain no copy thereof;
  • An express statement [acknowledgement] that the disclosed material was, indeed, privileged and that the company intended to preserve its privileged character;
  • An express statement that there was no general waiver of privilege as to the subject matters discussed in the documents, and there was no waiver of privilege as to third parties whatsoever;
  • An express confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement statement from the agency to which the documents were disclosed; and
  • An express agreement statement from the agency that it itself would not assert that the production of the materials constituted a waiver of the privilege in further proceedings.