Key Insight: Plaintiffs sought a protective order to prevent defendant from obtaining ESI from five different social media platforms they were active on. The court found that while a plaintiff’s social media postings could be relevant to a claim for “garden variety” emotional distress damages, some caution was necessary, such that a “deeper dive” into […]
Key Insight: Expenses responding to a subpoena also include fees spent on narrowing scope and litigation about the subpoena Nature of Case: Discovery dispute